unscientific research.

[maevele]

3/19, 2/11, 1/9, 2/14, 1/5, 2/15. 1/21, 0/19

can you guess?

Comments

[owlectomy]

Female representation in various anthologies, is my guess.

[bibliofile]

Or possibly even non-white-male participation. Pathetic, isn't it.

[brainwane]

I'm happy that Thoughtcrime Experiments was 4/9 female authors & 2/5 female artists. 2/9 PoC, less good and I'd work to up that in future anthologies.

[maevele]

and it was GOOD.

Squee!

[brainwane]

I'm so glad you liked it! Did you post a review? I have been meaning to post a collection of links to reviews.

[nmdrkangl.livejournal.com]

23/42

[maevele.livejournal.com]

where?

[nmdrkangl.livejournal.com]

there?

[yagathai.livejournal.com]

Where did you find the TOC? I looked last night and could only dig up one or two.

[maevele.livejournal.com]

Poking around on amazon for the recent ones that included toc or authors list, whichb was like 1/4, tops. Had to dig into the reviews for some. A couple were pulled from my shelves to check, too.

[emilytheslayer.livejournal.com]

Women or minorities vs number of white males in SF anthologies?

[bifemmefatale.livejournal.com]

That would be my guess too.

[maevele.livejournal.com]

Just women, in what random sample of recent anthologies i could find lists of authors. couldn't do race, because i only had the names to go on, and it's possible that my numbers could be thrown if there are more women authors writing under male names than i recognized.