jesus christing fuckinghell. just read Germaine Greer's guardian piece that people have been pissed about, and she can eat shit.
big fucking piles of stinky offal.
fuck her.
I'm neither quoting or linking, because it made me sick to my stomach and I don't want to pass that on.
big fucking piles of stinky offal.
fuck her.
I'm neither quoting or linking, because it made me sick to my stomach and I don't want to pass that on.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 07:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 07:40 pm (UTC)But then, I never thought she was any good at thinking, analysis or anything other than how to stay on top of any wave that was going. Her knowledge of history was never her strong point either.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 01:40 am (UTC)Greer... not for the first time.
Here is a much better link to cheer you.
http://www.blacklooks.org/2009/08/gender_terrorism_we_are_all_sara_baartman.html
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 01:35 am (UTC)DX
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 02:06 am (UTC)Also, WTF. Why is this person still writing professionally, if she's stopped being able to think?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:13 am (UTC)Feminism and hatred of trans women were joined at the hip for 40 years and counting.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:15 am (UTC)(Another post I found of hers while looking for this one for context: "Women just aren't funny! That's why there aren't many well known female comics." The stupid, it burns.)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:19 am (UTC)the dying body still has some kick tho..but, most feminists deny the history, and therefore give it power.
This is the same mentality that lets feminists give haters a voice and power in feminist circles. Which is why Greer can write in the Guardian, and a trans woman can't.
Hate sells, and the feminists keep buying, ignoring, and making excuses.
Like you just tried to do here minimizing it.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:29 am (UTC)That's pretty terrible.
Like you just tried to do here minimizing it.
Um, I'm sorry if I communicated that; it wasn't intentional at all. I'm trying to understand something I have very little knowledge of; I'm badly out of touch with the accepted feminist-circles because of their silencing of women of color.
I'm appalled at Greer, and the fact she still has a voice, and trying to understand the extent to which that voice is representative and who it's representative of. Is it out of place to ask how I managed to communicate minimizing?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:35 am (UTC)Well, minimizing like you did (and quickly recovered form) happened when you expressed doubt.
Really? It can't be THAT BAD. is so pervasive, its easy to read your commentary as such.
It is a common enough trope in feminism and your words and tone looked exactly like it. They came off as a demand to prove my oppression, because that's exactly what they were.
When someone does that, it is clear that they are using a privileged position to doubt a non privileged view.
Think a man wandering into a discussion among women of sexism and going "is it really still that bad? You guize have Title 9 now!" It's the same tone, and the same thing.
Prove your experience of oppression, cuz I don't believe it.
and that gets old, fast.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:40 am (UTC)I was trying to ask "I understand from what you said that it was this bad historically; does it continue to be this bad," but the way I said it was minimizing, because it wasn't distinguishable from "It's not actually so bad, is it?".
I'm very sorry for that. It wasn't what I meant; I am aware it *can* be this bad, and that's actually why I was asking.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:38 am (UTC)It seems pretty clearly inexcusable to me, and I'm not trying to minimize it, but to understand the background context.
From the search I did, it didn't seem like Greer had many supporters, though obviously I might be missing them because of the search terms I used. But even if that's right, there are situations where a sole and unpopular voice is still heard only because of historical reasons, and situations where people brush an older voice off as "no longer relevant" but actually there is an underlying culture of quieter bigotry that allows that voice to matter. I was trying (badly, I understand now, and I'm sorry for that) to ask which of the two was the situation here -- not in order to minimize the damage she does, but in order to better understand the situation (ironically, so that I *didn't* add to it with my ignorance).
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:42 am (UTC)Look at how badly white feminism has handled race, and how long they have had to address it.
After a century, racism is still almost as bad as ever in feminism, even if the nice white ladieeez don't say the N word to your face (usually).
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:48 am (UTC)I was attempting to ask how much worse, partly in order to understand whether it'd be possible to *remove* her as a voice, as it would have been if she had said anything near this bad about women of color.
If it's *so* much worse that she can get away with this, then I guess the next question is whether there's anything I could do to help change the culture, given non-insider status and limited resources?
3 simple rules for fighting for trans women s rights
Date: 2009-08-22 03:53 am (UTC)2) Call out transmisogyny and exclusion when you see it and it is safe to do so.
3) Don't get run over.
That third one's a bitch especially when doing 1 and or 2. Check your six when doing them...you'll be glad you did.
Re: 3 simple rules for fighting for trans women s rights
Date: 2009-08-22 04:04 am (UTC)I do, generally, speak out where I am able. Are there resources you'd recommend to understand the differences between speaking out against transphobia and speaking out against racism/sexism/hompphobia/ableism (where I have more experience)?
Re: 3 simple rules for fighting for trans women s rights
Date: 2009-08-22 04:07 am (UTC)Join and post to debunkingcis. Tell em I recommended you.
A lot of the rules are the same...just review your anti oppression stuff that you mentioned, and visit Questioning Transphobia. Read, and look at the links, and go from there.
Re: 3 simple rules for fighting for trans women s rights
Date: 2009-08-22 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:10 am (UTC)My rule is, when confronting a cis or white feminist:
"terminate with extreme prejudice."
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:22 am (UTC)Of course, its the practice and not just the thinking that does it.
Bring a towel, and a pot of coffee. You'll need both.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 12:44 pm (UTC)I think I've out-cussed my cussing quotient this week, so: Greer has a lot of nerve, and so does everyone policing Semenya's body.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 02:14 pm (UTC)Ms Greer: fade already! We don't need any more of your transphobic bullshit!